BioMoby

In attendance:

Mark, Eddie, Wendy, Richard, Ivan, Andreas, Paul, Martin, Mylah

We started with jokes about the danger of having the core Moby developers in the same room of a brick hospital built on top of a geological fault…

Issues that come up:
Atrtribution of data to providers
- set logo?

Should the Object ontology have multiple representations for any given concept?
- e.g. FASTA and DNA Sequence are redundant…
- we need to find a way to encourage object re-use
- we need a “rule-base” to use the SeaHawk transformation rules rather than registering a new Moby object; or do we still need to register a new object?

This entry was posted on Sunday, June 3rd, 2007 at 2:47 pm and is filed under General. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Edit this entry.